# Buettner and Pein Shut Down "Kingmaker" Rumors at FIDE Election
The FIDE presidency race just got messier. Jan Henric Buettner and Malcolm Pein issued a pointed joint statement from Samarkand denying what delegates were openly discussing in the hallways: that they'd engineered a backroom deal to hand their second-round votes to Timur Turlov if their own ticket underperforms in the first ballot.
The rumors made tactical sense, at least on paper. If Buettner and Pein's combined vote totals fell short of winning outright, throwing support to Turlov would almost certainly block Wadim Rosenstein, who has emerged as the frontrunner. Politics 101. Except both men flatly rejected the premise.
"Neither of us has agreed to deliver support or votes to Timur Turlov in any subsequent round," their statement declared. "Neither of us has been promised or accepted a position in a future Turlov administration."
It's a full denial on both counts. Not a "we're exploring options" or "all conversations remain fluid." They're saying no deal exists, period.
Why the denial matters now instead of waiting until after results arrive is the real story here. Delegate chatter in Samarkand carries weight. When rumors start circulating about side agreements, they can deflate your own campaign messaging and embolden your opponents. Buettner and Pein needed to kill this narrative before voting began, or face accusations they're simply using the race as a mechanism to stop Rosenstein rather than advance their own vision for FIDE.
The chess world has watched FIDE elections turn into soap operas before. Kasinov, Karpov, Kramnik administrations all had their share of political turbulence and coalition-building that felt more like boardroom warfare than governance. Transparency matters. Players, federations, and sponsors want to know the person elected actually intends to run the organization, not serve as a spoiler for someone else's ambitions.
Turlov himself remains in the picture as a serious challenger. He brings serious money and modernization credentials, particularly through his Chess.com backing. Whether delegates believe him, Rosenstein, or the Buettner-Pein ticket comes down to what voters prioritize: reform, continuity, business acumen, or proven administrative experience.
The first ballot will reveal what these denials were actually worth.
